← All games

Week 1 · Mon, Sep 14, 8:15 PM

DENatKC
Low confidencethis band has been right 57.3% of the time
DENKC

Model picks

KC

Model spread

KC -2.9

Market spread

3

the market forecasts these games better than this model

How the teams compare

heaviest model weight first · 0–100, oriented so higher is always better

Expected Points Added per play· weight 11.8

Offense

DEN36
KC7

EPA allowed

DEN86
KC82

Passing efficiency· weight 8.0

Offense

DEN33
KC5

EPA allowed

DEN97
KC76

Drive-sustaining rate· weight 6.6

Offense

DEN28
KC8

EPA allowed

DEN92
KC94

Position-weighted availability score· weight 6.6

No data yet for this metric. Nothing has been published for these teams at this point in the week. It will fill in once it exists.

Sacks taken per dropback· weight 5.7

Offense

DEN72
KC5

defensive rate

DEN99
KC58

Rushing efficiency

Offense

DEN47
KC60

EPA allowed

DEN13
KC77

Completion % Over Expected

Offense

DEN22
KC10

EPA allowed

DEN85
KC73

Giveaways per play

Offense

DEN77
KC77

defensive rate

DEN27
KC12

20+ yard completions per attempt

Offense

DEN15
KC18

EPA allowed

DEN85
KC65

This chart is not the model. It shows the inputs that read well as a side-by-side. 7 of the model’s heaviest-weighted inputs have no head-to-head form and are not drawn here: point differential, overall matchup, team win rate, pass matchup among them. The full list of all 55 is on the methodology tab.

Around the game

  • SchemeKC

    KC faces a 4-3 front

    DEN's roster profiles as a 4-3 base defense.

    Base front is inferred from roster composition (agrees with snap data at Spearman 0.50). Most teams play nickel by default, so this is a weak descriptor: measured defensive efficiency carries far more weight in the model.

  • Recent formKC

    KC -3.2 pts/game trend

    Over the last 10 games (exponentially weighted), KC has been being outscored by opponents by 3.2 points per game.

  • Recent formDEN

    DEN +3.4 pts/game trend

    Over the last 10 games (exponentially weighted), DEN has been outscoring opponents by 3.4 points per game.

  • VenueKC

    KC at home

    Home teams have won 54.7% of games in the training window; the model prices this in rather than applying a fixed bonus.

  • Context

    Divisional matchup

    Familiar opponents; historically tighter margins.

Every figure here comes from Calibrated Logistic Regression (core + market features), validated walk-forward by season (train on all prior seasons, test on the next). For how the model is built, what the metrics mean and how it has actually performed, read the methodology.