← All games

Week 1 · Sun, Sep 13, 1:00 PM

TBatCIN
High confidencethis band has been right 74.1% of the time
TBCIN

Model picks

CIN

Model spread

CIN -5.1

Market spread

3.5

the market forecasts these games better than this model

How the teams compare

heaviest model weight first · 0–100, oriented so higher is always better

Expected Points Added per play· weight 11.8

Offense

TB52
CIN81

EPA allowed

TB20
CIN23

Passing efficiency· weight 8.0

Offense

TB45
CIN65

EPA allowed

TB16
CIN43

Drive-sustaining rate· weight 6.6

Offense

TB48
CIN93

EPA allowed

TB27
CIN39

Position-weighted availability score· weight 6.6

No data yet for this metric. Nothing has been published for these teams at this point in the week. It will fill in once it exists.

Sacks taken per dropback· weight 5.7

Offense

TB37
CIN70

defensive rate

TB23
CIN98

Rushing efficiency

Offense

TB77
CIN92

EPA allowed

TB80
CIN9

Completion % Over Expected

Offense

TB43
CIN88

EPA allowed

TB10
CIN65

Giveaways per play

Offense

TB64
CIN68

defensive rate

TB56
CIN47

20+ yard completions per attempt

Offense

TB68
CIN43

EPA allowed

TB41
CIN8

This chart is not the model. It shows the inputs that read well as a side-by-side. 7 of the model’s heaviest-weighted inputs have no head-to-head form and are not drawn here: point differential, overall matchup, team win rate, pass matchup among them. The full list of all 55 is on the methodology tab.

Around the game

  • SchemeTB

    TB faces a 3-4 front

    CIN's roster profiles as a 3-4 base defense (nose tackle present, OLB-heavy edge group).

    Base front is inferred from roster composition (agrees with snap data at Spearman 0.50). Most teams play nickel by default, so this is a weak descriptor: measured defensive efficiency carries far more weight in the model.

  • Recent formCIN

    CIN +2.0 pts/game trend

    Over the last 10 games (exponentially weighted), CIN has been outscoring opponents by 2.0 points per game.

  • Recent formTB

    TB -2.1 pts/game trend

    Over the last 10 games (exponentially weighted), TB has been being outscored by opponents by 2.1 points per game.

  • VenueCIN

    CIN at home

    Home teams have won 54.7% of games in the training window; the model prices this in rather than applying a fixed bonus.

Every figure here comes from Calibrated Logistic Regression (core + market features), validated walk-forward by season (train on all prior seasons, test on the next). For how the model is built, what the metrics mean and how it has actually performed, read the methodology.