← All games

Week 3 · Sun, Sep 27, 1:00 PM

HOUatIND
Coin flip, no callthis band has been right 52.8% of the timethe two models pick different sides
HOUIND

Model leans

IND

this band is 49.8% accurate, so treat it as no call

Model spread

HOU -1.0

Market spread

-1.5

the market forecasts these games better than this model

How the teams compare

heaviest model weight first · 0–100, oriented so higher is always better

Expected Points Added per play· weight 11.8

Offense

HOU19
IND44

EPA allowed

HOU99
IND24

Passing efficiency· weight 8.0

Offense

HOU24
IND33

EPA allowed

HOU98
IND21

Drive-sustaining rate· weight 6.6

Offense

HOU16
IND53

EPA allowed

HOU98
IND14

Position-weighted availability score· weight 6.6

No data yet for this metric. Nothing has been published for these teams at this point in the week. It will fill in once it exists.

Sacks taken per dropback· weight 5.7

Offense

HOU82
IND76

defensive rate

HOU97
IND6

Rushing efficiency

Offense

HOU29
IND74

EPA allowed

HOU87
IND46

Completion % Over Expected

Offense

HOU6
IND28

EPA allowed

HOU85
IND69

Giveaways per play

Offense

HOU37
IND19

defensive rate

HOU92
IND12

20+ yard completions per attempt

Offense

HOU26
IND14

EPA allowed

HOU48
IND28

This chart is not the model. It shows the inputs that read well as a side-by-side. 7 of the model’s heaviest-weighted inputs have no head-to-head form and are not drawn here: point differential, overall matchup, team win rate, pass matchup among them. The full list of all 55 is on the methodology tab.

Around the game

  • SchemeIND

    IND faces a 4-3 front

    HOU's roster profiles as a 4-3 base defense.

    Base front is inferred from roster composition (agrees with snap data at Spearman 0.50). Most teams play nickel by default, so this is a weak descriptor: measured defensive efficiency carries far more weight in the model.

  • SchemeHOU

    HOU faces a 4-3 front

    IND's roster profiles as a 4-3 base defense.

    Base front is inferred from roster composition (agrees with snap data at Spearman 0.50). Most teams play nickel by default, so this is a weak descriptor: measured defensive efficiency carries far more weight in the model.

  • Recent formIND

    IND -5.0 pts/game trend

    Over the last 10 games (exponentially weighted), IND has been being outscored by opponents by 5.0 points per game.

  • Recent formHOU

    HOU +5.9 pts/game trend

    Over the last 10 games (exponentially weighted), HOU has been outscoring opponents by 5.9 points per game.

  • VenueIND

    IND at home

    Home teams have won 54.7% of games in the training window; the model prices this in rather than applying a fixed bonus.

  • Context

    Divisional matchup

    Familiar opponents; historically tighter margins.

Every figure here comes from Calibrated Logistic Regression (core + market features), validated walk-forward by season (train on all prior seasons, test on the next). For how the model is built, what the metrics mean and how it has actually performed, read the methodology.