← All games

Week 3 · Sun, Sep 27, 4:25 PM

LVatNO
High confidencethis band has been right 74.1% of the time
LVNO

Model picks

NO

Model spread

NO -4.4

Market spread

3.5

the market forecasts these games better than this model

How the teams compare

heaviest model weight first · 0–100, oriented so higher is always better

Expected Points Added per play· weight 11.8

Offense

LV0
NO54

EPA allowed

LV67
NO95

Passing efficiency· weight 8.0

Offense

LV2
NO61

EPA allowed

LV43
NO92

Drive-sustaining rate· weight 6.6

Offense

LV1
NO39

EPA allowed

LV71
NO95

Position-weighted availability score· weight 6.6

No data yet for this metric. Nothing has been published for these teams at this point in the week. It will fill in once it exists.

Sacks taken per dropback· weight 5.7

Offense

LV2
NO15

defensive rate

LV85
NO95

Rushing efficiency

Offense

LV1
NO29

EPA allowed

LV63
NO83

Completion % Over Expected

Offense

LV18
NO78

EPA allowed

LV34
NO79

Giveaways per play

Offense

LV43
NO52

defensive rate

LV9
NO29

20+ yard completions per attempt

Offense

LV5
NO30

EPA allowed

LV88
NO54

This chart is not the model. It shows the inputs that read well as a side-by-side. 7 of the model’s heaviest-weighted inputs have no head-to-head form and are not drawn here: point differential, overall matchup, team win rate, pass matchup among them. The full list of all 55 is on the methodology tab.

Around the game

  • SchemeLV

    LV faces a 3-4 front

    NO's roster profiles as a 3-4 base defense (nose tackle present, OLB-heavy edge group).

    Base front is inferred from roster composition (agrees with snap data at Spearman 0.50). Most teams play nickel by default, so this is a weak descriptor: measured defensive efficiency carries far more weight in the model.

  • Recent formNO

    NO +1.1 pts/game trend

    Over the last 10 games (exponentially weighted), NO has been outscoring opponents by 1.1 points per game.

  • Recent formLV

    LV -11.4 pts/game trend

    Over the last 10 games (exponentially weighted), LV has been being outscored by opponents by 11.4 points per game.

  • VenueNO

    NO at home

    Home teams have won 54.7% of games in the training window; the model prices this in rather than applying a fixed bonus.

Every figure here comes from Calibrated Logistic Regression (core + market features), validated walk-forward by season (train on all prior seasons, test on the next). For how the model is built, what the metrics mean and how it has actually performed, read the methodology.