← All games

Week 4 · Sun, Oct 4, 1:00 PM

NEatBUF
Medium confidencethis band has been right 63.4% of the time
NEBUF

Model picks

BUF

Model spread

BUF -4.3

Market spread

3

the market forecasts these games better than this model

How the teams compare

heaviest model weight first · 0–100, oriented so higher is always better

Expected Points Added per play· weight 11.8

Offense

NE43
BUF92

EPA allowed

NE98
BUF66

Passing efficiency· weight 8.0

Offense

NE35
BUF84

EPA allowed

NE98
BUF88

Drive-sustaining rate· weight 6.6

Offense

NE43
BUF92

EPA allowed

NE93
BUF49

Position-weighted availability score· weight 6.6

No data yet for this metric. Nothing has been published for these teams at this point in the week. It will fill in once it exists.

Sacks taken per dropback· weight 5.7

Offense

NE2
BUF48

defensive rate

NE66
BUF11

Rushing efficiency

Offense

NE77
BUF95

EPA allowed

NE64
BUF15

Completion % Over Expected

Offense

NE76
BUF89

EPA allowed

NE89
BUF94

Giveaways per play

Offense

NE54
BUF47

defensive rate

NE61
BUF37

20+ yard completions per attempt

Offense

NE97
BUF77

EPA allowed

NE100
BUF89

This chart is not the model. It shows the inputs that read well as a side-by-side. 7 of the model’s heaviest-weighted inputs have no head-to-head form and are not drawn here: point differential, overall matchup, team win rate, pass matchup among them. The full list of all 55 is on the methodology tab.

Around the game

  • SchemeNE

    NE faces a 4-3 front

    BUF's roster profiles as a 4-3 base defense.

    Base front is inferred from roster composition (agrees with snap data at Spearman 0.50). Most teams play nickel by default, so this is a weak descriptor: measured defensive efficiency carries far more weight in the model.

  • Recent formBUF

    BUF +5.5 pts/game trend

    Over the last 10 games (exponentially weighted), BUF has been outscoring opponents by 5.5 points per game.

  • Recent formNE

    NE +6.6 pts/game trend

    Over the last 10 games (exponentially weighted), NE has been outscoring opponents by 6.6 points per game.

  • VenueBUF

    BUF at home

    Home teams have won 54.7% of games in the training window; the model prices this in rather than applying a fixed bonus.

  • Context

    Divisional matchup

    Familiar opponents; historically tighter margins.

Every figure here comes from Calibrated Logistic Regression (core + market features), validated walk-forward by season (train on all prior seasons, test on the next). For how the model is built, what the metrics mean and how it has actually performed, read the methodology.