← All games

Week 6 · Sun, Oct 18, 1:00 PM

BALatCLE
High confidencethis band has been right 74.1% of the time
BALCLE

Model picks

BAL

Model spread

BAL -8.7

Market spread

-6.5

the market forecasts these games better than this model

How the teams compare

heaviest model weight first · 0–100, oriented so higher is always better

Expected Points Added per play· weight 11.8

Offense

BAL89
CLE3

EPA allowed

BAL44
CLE80

Passing efficiency· weight 8.0

Offense

BAL72
CLE1

EPA allowed

BAL28
CLE97

Drive-sustaining rate· weight 6.6

Offense

BAL72
CLE1

EPA allowed

BAL48
CLE54

Position-weighted availability score· weight 6.6

No data yet for this metric. Nothing has been published for these teams at this point in the week. It will fill in once it exists.

Sacks taken per dropback· weight 5.7

Offense

BAL7
CLE3

defensive rate

BAL32
CLE88

Rushing efficiency

Offense

BAL99
CLE59

EPA allowed

BAL91
CLE9

Completion % Over Expected

Offense

BAL85
CLE11

EPA allowed

BAL21
CLE60

Giveaways per play

Offense

BAL47
CLE18

defensive rate

BAL42
CLE11

20+ yard completions per attempt

Offense

BAL89
CLE16

EPA allowed

BAL7
CLE76

This chart is not the model. It shows the inputs that read well as a side-by-side. 7 of the model’s heaviest-weighted inputs have no head-to-head form and are not drawn here: point differential, overall matchup, team win rate, pass matchup among them. The full list of all 55 is on the methodology tab.

Around the game

  • SchemeBAL

    BAL faces a 4-3 front

    CLE's roster profiles as a 4-3 base defense.

    Base front is inferred from roster composition (agrees with snap data at Spearman 0.50). Most teams play nickel by default, so this is a weak descriptor: measured defensive efficiency carries far more weight in the model.

  • Recent formCLE

    CLE -4.2 pts/game trend

    Over the last 10 games (exponentially weighted), CLE has been being outscored by opponents by 4.2 points per game.

  • Recent formBAL

    BAL +4.2 pts/game trend

    Over the last 10 games (exponentially weighted), BAL has been outscoring opponents by 4.2 points per game.

  • VenueCLE

    CLE at home

    Home teams have won 54.7% of games in the training window; the model prices this in rather than applying a fixed bonus.

  • Context

    Divisional matchup

    Familiar opponents; historically tighter margins.

Every figure here comes from Calibrated Logistic Regression (core + market features), validated walk-forward by season (train on all prior seasons, test on the next). For how the model is built, what the metrics mean and how it has actually performed, read the methodology.