← All games

Week 6 · Sun, Oct 18, 1:00 PM

NOatNYG
High confidencethis band has been right 74.1% of the time
NONYG

Model picks

NYG

Model spread

NYG -3.3

Market spread

2.5

the market forecasts these games better than this model

How the teams compare

heaviest model weight first · 0–100, oriented so higher is always better

Expected Points Added per play· weight 11.8

Offense

NO54
NYG69

EPA allowed

NO95
NYG45

Passing efficiency· weight 8.0

Offense

NO61
NYG35

EPA allowed

NO92
NYG75

Drive-sustaining rate· weight 6.6

Offense

NO39
NYG44

EPA allowed

NO95
NYG20

Position-weighted availability score· weight 6.6

No data yet for this metric. Nothing has been published for these teams at this point in the week. It will fill in once it exists.

Sacks taken per dropback· weight 5.7

Offense

NO15
NYG6

defensive rate

NO95
NYG76

Rushing efficiency

Offense

NO29
NYG95

EPA allowed

NO83
NYG3

Completion % Over Expected

Offense

NO78
NYG37

EPA allowed

NO79
NYG26

Giveaways per play

Offense

NO52
NYG90

defensive rate

NO29
NYG53

20+ yard completions per attempt

Offense

NO30
NYG40

EPA allowed

NO54
NYG38

This chart is not the model. It shows the inputs that read well as a side-by-side. 7 of the model’s heaviest-weighted inputs have no head-to-head form and are not drawn here: point differential, overall matchup, team win rate, pass matchup among them. The full list of all 55 is on the methodology tab.

Around the game

  • SchemeNYG

    NYG faces a 3-4 front

    NO's roster profiles as a 3-4 base defense (nose tackle present, OLB-heavy edge group).

    Base front is inferred from roster composition (agrees with snap data at Spearman 0.50). Most teams play nickel by default, so this is a weak descriptor: measured defensive efficiency carries far more weight in the model.

  • SchemeNO

    NO faces a 3-4 front

    NYG's roster profiles as a 3-4 base defense (nose tackle present, OLB-heavy edge group).

    Base front is inferred from roster composition (agrees with snap data at Spearman 0.50). Most teams play nickel by default, so this is a weak descriptor: measured defensive efficiency carries far more weight in the model.

  • Recent formNYG

    NYG +1.7 pts/game trend

    Over the last 10 games (exponentially weighted), NYG has been outscoring opponents by 1.7 points per game.

  • Recent formNO

    NO +1.1 pts/game trend

    Over the last 10 games (exponentially weighted), NO has been outscoring opponents by 1.1 points per game.

  • VenueNYG

    NYG at home

    Home teams have won 54.7% of games in the training window; the model prices this in rather than applying a fixed bonus.

Every figure here comes from Calibrated Logistic Regression (core + market features), validated walk-forward by season (train on all prior seasons, test on the next). For how the model is built, what the metrics mean and how it has actually performed, read the methodology.