← All games

Week 8 · Sun, Nov 1, 1:00 PM

INDatJAX
Medium confidencethis band has been right 63.4% of the time
INDJAX

Model picks

JAX

Model spread

JAX -2.5

Market spread

n/a

the market forecasts these games better than this model

How the teams compare

heaviest model weight first · 0–100, oriented so higher is always better

Expected Points Added per play· weight 11.8

Offense

IND44
JAX80

EPA allowed

IND24
JAX88

Passing efficiency· weight 8.0

Offense

IND33
JAX82

EPA allowed

IND21
JAX95

Drive-sustaining rate· weight 6.6

Offense

IND53
JAX90

EPA allowed

IND14
JAX76

Position-weighted availability score· weight 6.6

No data yet for this metric. Nothing has been published for these teams at this point in the week. It will fill in once it exists.

Sacks taken per dropback· weight 5.7

Offense

IND76
JAX62

defensive rate

IND6
JAX13

Rushing efficiency

Offense

IND74
JAX56

EPA allowed

IND46
JAX20

Completion % Over Expected

Offense

IND28
JAX62

EPA allowed

IND69
JAX65

Giveaways per play

Offense

IND19
JAX68

defensive rate

IND12
JAX68

20+ yard completions per attempt

Offense

IND14
JAX85

EPA allowed

IND28
JAX93

This chart is not the model. It shows the inputs that read well as a side-by-side. 7 of the model’s heaviest-weighted inputs have no head-to-head form and are not drawn here: point differential, overall matchup, team win rate, pass matchup among them. The full list of all 55 is on the methodology tab.

Around the game

  • RestJAX

    JAX coming off a bye

    14 days of rest before kickoff.

  • SchemeJAX

    JAX faces a 4-3 front

    IND's roster profiles as a 4-3 base defense.

    Base front is inferred from roster composition (agrees with snap data at Spearman 0.50). Most teams play nickel by default, so this is a weak descriptor: measured defensive efficiency carries far more weight in the model.

  • SchemeIND

    IND faces a 4-3 front

    JAX's roster profiles as a 4-3 base defense.

    Base front is inferred from roster composition (agrees with snap data at Spearman 0.50). Most teams play nickel by default, so this is a weak descriptor: measured defensive efficiency carries far more weight in the model.

  • Recent formJAX

    JAX +11.7 pts/game trend

    Over the last 10 games (exponentially weighted), JAX has been outscoring opponents by 11.7 points per game.

  • Recent formIND

    IND -5.0 pts/game trend

    Over the last 10 games (exponentially weighted), IND has been being outscored by opponents by 5.0 points per game.

  • VenueJAX

    JAX at home

    Home teams have won 54.7% of games in the training window; the model prices this in rather than applying a fixed bonus.

  • RestJAX

    JAX holds a rest advantage

    7 more days of recovery than the opponent.

  • Context

    Divisional matchup

    Familiar opponents; historically tighter margins.

Every figure here comes from Calibrated Logistic Regression (core + market features), validated walk-forward by season (train on all prior seasons, test on the next). For how the model is built, what the metrics mean and how it has actually performed, read the methodology.