← All games

Week 8 · Sun, Nov 1, 1:00 PM

MINatDET
Low confidencethis band has been right 57.3% of the time
MINDET

Model picks

DET

Model spread

DET -2.7

Market spread

n/a

the market forecasts these games better than this model

How the teams compare

heaviest model weight first · 0–100, oriented so higher is always better

Expected Points Added per play· weight 11.8

Offense

MIN11
DET67

EPA allowed

MIN99
DET37

Passing efficiency· weight 8.0

Offense

MIN4
DET74

EPA allowed

MIN100
DET70

Drive-sustaining rate· weight 6.6

Offense

MIN38
DET81

EPA allowed

MIN88
DET61

Position-weighted availability score· weight 6.6

No data yet for this metric. Nothing has been published for these teams at this point in the week. It will fill in once it exists.

Sacks taken per dropback· weight 5.7

Offense

MIN1
DET38

defensive rate

MIN100
DET88

Rushing efficiency

Offense

MIN71
DET25

EPA allowed

MIN84
DET4

Completion % Over Expected

Offense

MIN22
DET41

EPA allowed

MIN100
DET73

Giveaways per play

Offense

MIN31
DET60

defensive rate

MIN69
DET11

20+ yard completions per attempt

Offense

MIN13
DET90

EPA allowed

MIN99
DET48

This chart is not the model. It shows the inputs that read well as a side-by-side. 7 of the model’s heaviest-weighted inputs have no head-to-head form and are not drawn here: point differential, overall matchup, team win rate, pass matchup among them. The full list of all 55 is on the methodology tab.

Around the game

  • SchemeMIN

    MIN faces a 4-3 front

    DET's roster profiles as a 4-3 base defense.

    Base front is inferred from roster composition (agrees with snap data at Spearman 0.50). Most teams play nickel by default, so this is a weak descriptor: measured defensive efficiency carries far more weight in the model.

  • Recent formDET

    DET -0.1 pts/game trend

    Over the last 10 games (exponentially weighted), DET has been being outscored by opponents by 0.1 points per game.

  • Recent formMIN

    MIN +4.5 pts/game trend

    Over the last 10 games (exponentially weighted), MIN has been outscoring opponents by 4.5 points per game.

  • VenueDET

    DET at home

    Home teams have won 54.7% of games in the training window; the model prices this in rather than applying a fixed bonus.

  • Context

    Divisional matchup

    Familiar opponents; historically tighter margins.

Every figure here comes from Calibrated Logistic Regression (core + market features), validated walk-forward by season (train on all prior seasons, test on the next). For how the model is built, what the metrics mean and how it has actually performed, read the methodology.