← All games

Week 9 · Sun, Nov 8, 4:25 PM

GBatNE
High confidencethis band has been right 74.1% of the time
GBNE

Model picks

NE

Model spread

NE -4.6

Market spread

n/a

the market forecasts these games better than this model

How the teams compare

heaviest model weight first · 0–100, oriented so higher is always better

Expected Points Added per play· weight 11.8

Offense

GB78
NE43

EPA allowed

GB15
NE98

Passing efficiency· weight 8.0

Offense

GB71
NE35

EPA allowed

GB16
NE98

Drive-sustaining rate· weight 6.6

Offense

GB69
NE43

EPA allowed

GB17
NE93

Position-weighted availability score· weight 6.6

No data yet for this metric. Nothing has been published for these teams at this point in the week. It will fill in once it exists.

Sacks taken per dropback· weight 5.7

Offense

GB22
NE2

defensive rate

GB14
NE66

Rushing efficiency

Offense

GB46
NE77

EPA allowed

GB38
NE64

Completion % Over Expected

Offense

GB72
NE76

EPA allowed

GB38
NE89

Giveaways per play

Offense

GB91
NE54

defensive rate

GB16
NE61

20+ yard completions per attempt

Offense

GB93
NE97

EPA allowed

GB25
NE100

This chart is not the model. It shows the inputs that read well as a side-by-side. 7 of the model’s heaviest-weighted inputs have no head-to-head form and are not drawn here: point differential, overall matchup, team win rate, pass matchup among them. The full list of all 55 is on the methodology tab.

Around the game

  • SchemeNE

    NE faces a 4-3 front

    GB's roster profiles as a 4-3 base defense.

    Base front is inferred from roster composition (agrees with snap data at Spearman 0.50). Most teams play nickel by default, so this is a weak descriptor: measured defensive efficiency carries far more weight in the model.

  • Recent formNE

    NE +6.6 pts/game trend

    Over the last 10 games (exponentially weighted), NE has been outscoring opponents by 6.6 points per game.

  • Recent formGB

    GB -3.7 pts/game trend

    Over the last 10 games (exponentially weighted), GB has been being outscored by opponents by 3.7 points per game.

  • VenueNE

    NE at home

    Home teams have won 54.7% of games in the training window; the model prices this in rather than applying a fixed bonus.

  • RestGB

    GB holds a rest advantage

    3 more days of recovery than the opponent.

Every figure here comes from Calibrated Logistic Regression (core + market features), validated walk-forward by season (train on all prior seasons, test on the next). For how the model is built, what the metrics mean and how it has actually performed, read the methodology.