← All games

Week 11 · Thu, Nov 19, 8:15 PM

INDatHOU
Medium confidencethis band has been right 63.4% of the time
INDHOU

Model picks

HOU

Model spread

HOU -2.0

Market spread

n/a

the market forecasts these games better than this model

How the teams compare

heaviest model weight first · 0–100, oriented so higher is always better

Expected Points Added per play· weight 11.8

Offense

IND44
HOU19

EPA allowed

IND24
HOU99

Passing efficiency· weight 8.0

Offense

IND33
HOU24

EPA allowed

IND21
HOU98

Drive-sustaining rate· weight 6.6

Offense

IND53
HOU16

EPA allowed

IND14
HOU98

Position-weighted availability score· weight 6.6

No data yet for this metric. Nothing has been published for these teams at this point in the week. It will fill in once it exists.

Sacks taken per dropback· weight 5.7

Offense

IND76
HOU82

defensive rate

IND6
HOU97

Rushing efficiency

Offense

IND74
HOU29

EPA allowed

IND46
HOU87

Completion % Over Expected

Offense

IND28
HOU6

EPA allowed

IND69
HOU85

Giveaways per play

Offense

IND19
HOU37

defensive rate

IND12
HOU92

20+ yard completions per attempt

Offense

IND14
HOU26

EPA allowed

IND28
HOU48

This chart is not the model. It shows the inputs that read well as a side-by-side. 7 of the model’s heaviest-weighted inputs have no head-to-head form and are not drawn here: point differential, overall matchup, team win rate, pass matchup among them. The full list of all 55 is on the methodology tab.

Around the game

  • RestHOU

    HOU on a short week

    Only 4 days of rest.

  • RestIND

    IND on a short week

    Only 4 days of rest.

  • SchemeHOU

    HOU faces a 4-3 front

    IND's roster profiles as a 4-3 base defense.

    Base front is inferred from roster composition (agrees with snap data at Spearman 0.50). Most teams play nickel by default, so this is a weak descriptor: measured defensive efficiency carries far more weight in the model.

  • SchemeIND

    IND faces a 4-3 front

    HOU's roster profiles as a 4-3 base defense.

    Base front is inferred from roster composition (agrees with snap data at Spearman 0.50). Most teams play nickel by default, so this is a weak descriptor: measured defensive efficiency carries far more weight in the model.

  • Recent formHOU

    HOU +5.9 pts/game trend

    Over the last 10 games (exponentially weighted), HOU has been outscoring opponents by 5.9 points per game.

  • Recent formIND

    IND -5.0 pts/game trend

    Over the last 10 games (exponentially weighted), IND has been being outscored by opponents by 5.0 points per game.

  • VenueHOU

    HOU at home

    Home teams have won 54.7% of games in the training window; the model prices this in rather than applying a fixed bonus.

  • Context

    Divisional matchup

    Familiar opponents; historically tighter margins.

Every figure here comes from Calibrated Logistic Regression (core + market features), validated walk-forward by season (train on all prior seasons, test on the next). For how the model is built, what the metrics mean and how it has actually performed, read the methodology.