← All games

Week 11 · Sun, Nov 22, 1:00 PM

TBatDET
Coin flip, no callthis band has been right 52.8% of the time
TBDET

Model leans

DET

this band is 49.8% accurate, so treat it as no call

Model spread

DET -1.7

Market spread

n/a

the market forecasts these games better than this model

How the teams compare

heaviest model weight first · 0–100, oriented so higher is always better

Expected Points Added per play· weight 11.8

Offense

TB52
DET67

EPA allowed

TB20
DET37

Passing efficiency· weight 8.0

Offense

TB45
DET74

EPA allowed

TB16
DET70

Drive-sustaining rate· weight 6.6

Offense

TB48
DET81

EPA allowed

TB27
DET61

Position-weighted availability score· weight 6.6

No data yet for this metric. Nothing has been published for these teams at this point in the week. It will fill in once it exists.

Sacks taken per dropback· weight 5.7

Offense

TB37
DET38

defensive rate

TB23
DET88

Rushing efficiency

Offense

TB77
DET25

EPA allowed

TB80
DET4

Completion % Over Expected

Offense

TB43
DET41

EPA allowed

TB10
DET73

Giveaways per play

Offense

TB64
DET60

defensive rate

TB56
DET11

20+ yard completions per attempt

Offense

TB68
DET90

EPA allowed

TB41
DET48

This chart is not the model. It shows the inputs that read well as a side-by-side. 7 of the model’s heaviest-weighted inputs have no head-to-head form and are not drawn here: point differential, overall matchup, team win rate, pass matchup among them. The full list of all 55 is on the methodology tab.

Around the game

  • RestTB

    TB coming off a bye

    14 days of rest before kickoff.

  • SchemeTB

    TB faces a 4-3 front

    DET's roster profiles as a 4-3 base defense.

    Base front is inferred from roster composition (agrees with snap data at Spearman 0.50). Most teams play nickel by default, so this is a weak descriptor: measured defensive efficiency carries far more weight in the model.

  • Recent formDET

    DET -0.1 pts/game trend

    Over the last 10 games (exponentially weighted), DET has been being outscored by opponents by 0.1 points per game.

  • Recent formTB

    TB -2.1 pts/game trend

    Over the last 10 games (exponentially weighted), TB has been being outscored by opponents by 2.1 points per game.

  • VenueDET

    DET at home

    Home teams have won 54.7% of games in the training window; the model prices this in rather than applying a fixed bonus.

  • RestTB

    TB holds a rest advantage

    7 more days of recovery than the opponent.

Every figure here comes from Calibrated Logistic Regression (core + market features), validated walk-forward by season (train on all prior seasons, test on the next). For how the model is built, what the metrics mean and how it has actually performed, read the methodology.