← All games

Week 12 · Mon, Nov 30, 8:15 PM

CARatTB
Low confidencethis band has been right 57.3% of the time
CARTB

Model picks

TB

Model spread

TB -3.3

Market spread

n/a

the market forecasts these games better than this model

How the teams compare

heaviest model weight first · 0–100, oriented so higher is always better

Expected Points Added per play· weight 11.8

Offense

CAR24
TB52

EPA allowed

CAR21
TB20

Passing efficiency· weight 8.0

Offense

CAR22
TB45

EPA allowed

CAR30
TB16

Drive-sustaining rate· weight 6.6

Offense

CAR29
TB48

EPA allowed

CAR25
TB27

Position-weighted availability score· weight 6.6

No data yet for this metric. Nothing has been published for these teams at this point in the week. It will fill in once it exists.

Sacks taken per dropback· weight 5.7

Offense

CAR64
TB37

defensive rate

CAR49
TB23

Rushing efficiency

Offense

CAR38
TB77

EPA allowed

CAR13
TB80

Completion % Over Expected

Offense

CAR63
TB43

EPA allowed

CAR39
TB10

Giveaways per play

Offense

CAR24
TB64

defensive rate

CAR37
TB56

20+ yard completions per attempt

Offense

CAR31
TB68

EPA allowed

CAR85
TB41

This chart is not the model. It shows the inputs that read well as a side-by-side. 7 of the model’s heaviest-weighted inputs have no head-to-head form and are not drawn here: point differential, overall matchup, team win rate, pass matchup among them. The full list of all 55 is on the methodology tab.

Around the game

  • SchemeTB

    TB faces a 3-4 front

    CAR's roster profiles as a 3-4 base defense (nose tackle present, OLB-heavy edge group).

    Base front is inferred from roster composition (agrees with snap data at Spearman 0.50). Most teams play nickel by default, so this is a weak descriptor: measured defensive efficiency carries far more weight in the model.

  • Recent formTB

    TB -2.1 pts/game trend

    Over the last 10 games (exponentially weighted), TB has been being outscored by opponents by 2.1 points per game.

  • Recent formCAR

    CAR -4.3 pts/game trend

    Over the last 10 games (exponentially weighted), CAR has been being outscored by opponents by 4.3 points per game.

  • VenueTB

    TB at home

    Home teams have won 54.7% of games in the training window; the model prices this in rather than applying a fixed bonus.

  • Context

    Divisional matchup

    Familiar opponents; historically tighter margins.

Every figure here comes from Calibrated Logistic Regression (core + market features), validated walk-forward by season (train on all prior seasons, test on the next). For how the model is built, what the metrics mean and how it has actually performed, read the methodology.