← All games

Week 12 · Sun, Nov 29, 1:00 PM

NYGatIND
High confidencethis band has been right 74.1% of the time
NYGIND

Model picks

IND

Model spread

IND -5.3

Market spread

n/a

the market forecasts these games better than this model

How the teams compare

heaviest model weight first · 0–100, oriented so higher is always better

Expected Points Added per play· weight 11.8

Offense

NYG69
IND44

EPA allowed

NYG45
IND24

Passing efficiency· weight 8.0

Offense

NYG35
IND33

EPA allowed

NYG75
IND21

Drive-sustaining rate· weight 6.6

Offense

NYG44
IND53

EPA allowed

NYG20
IND14

Position-weighted availability score· weight 6.6

No data yet for this metric. Nothing has been published for these teams at this point in the week. It will fill in once it exists.

Sacks taken per dropback· weight 5.7

Offense

NYG6
IND76

defensive rate

NYG76
IND6

Rushing efficiency

Offense

NYG95
IND74

EPA allowed

NYG3
IND46

Completion % Over Expected

Offense

NYG37
IND28

EPA allowed

NYG26
IND69

Giveaways per play

Offense

NYG90
IND19

defensive rate

NYG53
IND12

20+ yard completions per attempt

Offense

NYG40
IND14

EPA allowed

NYG38
IND28

This chart is not the model. It shows the inputs that read well as a side-by-side. 7 of the model’s heaviest-weighted inputs have no head-to-head form and are not drawn here: point differential, overall matchup, team win rate, pass matchup among them. The full list of all 55 is on the methodology tab.

Around the game

  • SchemeIND

    IND faces a 3-4 front

    NYG's roster profiles as a 3-4 base defense (nose tackle present, OLB-heavy edge group).

    Base front is inferred from roster composition (agrees with snap data at Spearman 0.50). Most teams play nickel by default, so this is a weak descriptor: measured defensive efficiency carries far more weight in the model.

  • SchemeNYG

    NYG faces a 4-3 front

    IND's roster profiles as a 4-3 base defense.

    Base front is inferred from roster composition (agrees with snap data at Spearman 0.50). Most teams play nickel by default, so this is a weak descriptor: measured defensive efficiency carries far more weight in the model.

  • Recent formIND

    IND -5.0 pts/game trend

    Over the last 10 games (exponentially weighted), IND has been being outscored by opponents by 5.0 points per game.

  • Recent formNYG

    NYG +1.7 pts/game trend

    Over the last 10 games (exponentially weighted), NYG has been outscoring opponents by 1.7 points per game.

  • VenueIND

    IND at home

    Home teams have won 54.7% of games in the training window; the model prices this in rather than applying a fixed bonus.

  • RestIND

    IND holds a rest advantage

    3 more days of recovery than the opponent.

Every figure here comes from Calibrated Logistic Regression (core + market features), validated walk-forward by season (train on all prior seasons, test on the next). For how the model is built, what the metrics mean and how it has actually performed, read the methodology.