← All games

Week 16 · Sun, Dec 27, 1:00 PM

CINatIND
Medium confidencethis band has been right 63.4% of the time
CININD

Model picks

IND

Model spread

IND -3.7

Market spread

n/a

the market forecasts these games better than this model

How the teams compare

heaviest model weight first · 0–100, oriented so higher is always better

Expected Points Added per play· weight 11.8

Offense

CIN81
IND44

EPA allowed

CIN23
IND24

Passing efficiency· weight 8.0

Offense

CIN65
IND33

EPA allowed

CIN43
IND21

Drive-sustaining rate· weight 6.6

Offense

CIN93
IND53

EPA allowed

CIN39
IND14

Position-weighted availability score· weight 6.6

No data yet for this metric. Nothing has been published for these teams at this point in the week. It will fill in once it exists.

Sacks taken per dropback· weight 5.7

Offense

CIN70
IND76

defensive rate

CIN98
IND6

Rushing efficiency

Offense

CIN92
IND74

EPA allowed

CIN9
IND46

Completion % Over Expected

Offense

CIN88
IND28

EPA allowed

CIN65
IND69

Giveaways per play

Offense

CIN68
IND19

defensive rate

CIN47
IND12

20+ yard completions per attempt

Offense

CIN43
IND14

EPA allowed

CIN8
IND28

This chart is not the model. It shows the inputs that read well as a side-by-side. 7 of the model’s heaviest-weighted inputs have no head-to-head form and are not drawn here: point differential, overall matchup, team win rate, pass matchup among them. The full list of all 55 is on the methodology tab.

Around the game

  • SchemeIND

    IND faces a 3-4 front

    CIN's roster profiles as a 3-4 base defense (nose tackle present, OLB-heavy edge group).

    Base front is inferred from roster composition (agrees with snap data at Spearman 0.50). Most teams play nickel by default, so this is a weak descriptor: measured defensive efficiency carries far more weight in the model.

  • SchemeCIN

    CIN faces a 4-3 front

    IND's roster profiles as a 4-3 base defense.

    Base front is inferred from roster composition (agrees with snap data at Spearman 0.50). Most teams play nickel by default, so this is a weak descriptor: measured defensive efficiency carries far more weight in the model.

  • Recent formIND

    IND -5.0 pts/game trend

    Over the last 10 games (exponentially weighted), IND has been being outscored by opponents by 5.0 points per game.

  • Recent formCIN

    CIN +2.0 pts/game trend

    Over the last 10 games (exponentially weighted), CIN has been outscoring opponents by 2.0 points per game.

  • VenueIND

    IND at home

    Home teams have won 54.7% of games in the training window; the model prices this in rather than applying a fixed bonus.

Every figure here comes from Calibrated Logistic Regression (core + market features), validated walk-forward by season (train on all prior seasons, test on the next). For how the model is built, what the metrics mean and how it has actually performed, read the methodology.