← All games

Week 16 · Sun, Dec 27, 1:00 PM

CLEatBAL
Medium confidencethis band has been right 63.4% of the time
CLEBAL

Model picks

BAL

Model spread

BAL -4.6

Market spread

n/a

the market forecasts these games better than this model

How the teams compare

heaviest model weight first · 0–100, oriented so higher is always better

Expected Points Added per play· weight 11.8

Offense

CLE3
BAL89

EPA allowed

CLE80
BAL44

Passing efficiency· weight 8.0

Offense

CLE1
BAL72

EPA allowed

CLE97
BAL28

Drive-sustaining rate· weight 6.6

Offense

CLE1
BAL72

EPA allowed

CLE54
BAL48

Position-weighted availability score· weight 6.6

No data yet for this metric. Nothing has been published for these teams at this point in the week. It will fill in once it exists.

Sacks taken per dropback· weight 5.7

Offense

CLE3
BAL7

defensive rate

CLE88
BAL32

Rushing efficiency

Offense

CLE59
BAL99

EPA allowed

CLE9
BAL91

Completion % Over Expected

Offense

CLE11
BAL85

EPA allowed

CLE60
BAL21

Giveaways per play

Offense

CLE18
BAL47

defensive rate

CLE11
BAL42

20+ yard completions per attempt

Offense

CLE16
BAL89

EPA allowed

CLE76
BAL7

This chart is not the model. It shows the inputs that read well as a side-by-side. 7 of the model’s heaviest-weighted inputs have no head-to-head form and are not drawn here: point differential, overall matchup, team win rate, pass matchup among them. The full list of all 55 is on the methodology tab.

Around the game

  • SchemeBAL

    BAL faces a 4-3 front

    CLE's roster profiles as a 4-3 base defense.

    Base front is inferred from roster composition (agrees with snap data at Spearman 0.50). Most teams play nickel by default, so this is a weak descriptor: measured defensive efficiency carries far more weight in the model.

  • Recent formBAL

    BAL +4.2 pts/game trend

    Over the last 10 games (exponentially weighted), BAL has been outscoring opponents by 4.2 points per game.

  • Recent formCLE

    CLE -4.2 pts/game trend

    Over the last 10 games (exponentially weighted), CLE has been being outscored by opponents by 4.2 points per game.

  • VenueBAL

    BAL at home

    Home teams have won 54.7% of games in the training window; the model prices this in rather than applying a fixed bonus.

  • Context

    Divisional matchup

    Familiar opponents; historically tighter margins.

Every figure here comes from Calibrated Logistic Regression (core + market features), validated walk-forward by season (train on all prior seasons, test on the next). For how the model is built, what the metrics mean and how it has actually performed, read the methodology.