← All games

Week 17 · Sun, Jan 3, 1:00 PM

INDatCLE
Coin flip, no callthis band has been right 52.8% of the time
INDCLE

Model leans

CLE

this band is 49.8% accurate, so treat it as no call

Model spread

CLE -2.1

Market spread

n/a

the market forecasts these games better than this model

How the teams compare

heaviest model weight first · 0–100, oriented so higher is always better

Expected Points Added per play· weight 11.8

Offense

IND44
CLE3

EPA allowed

IND24
CLE80

Passing efficiency· weight 8.0

Offense

IND33
CLE1

EPA allowed

IND21
CLE97

Drive-sustaining rate· weight 6.6

Offense

IND53
CLE1

EPA allowed

IND14
CLE54

Position-weighted availability score· weight 6.6

No data yet for this metric. Nothing has been published for these teams at this point in the week. It will fill in once it exists.

Sacks taken per dropback· weight 5.7

Offense

IND76
CLE3

defensive rate

IND6
CLE88

Rushing efficiency

Offense

IND74
CLE59

EPA allowed

IND46
CLE9

Completion % Over Expected

Offense

IND28
CLE11

EPA allowed

IND69
CLE60

Giveaways per play

Offense

IND19
CLE18

defensive rate

IND12
CLE11

20+ yard completions per attempt

Offense

IND14
CLE16

EPA allowed

IND28
CLE76

This chart is not the model. It shows the inputs that read well as a side-by-side. 7 of the model’s heaviest-weighted inputs have no head-to-head form and are not drawn here: point differential, overall matchup, team win rate, pass matchup among them. The full list of all 55 is on the methodology tab.

Around the game

  • SchemeCLE

    CLE faces a 4-3 front

    IND's roster profiles as a 4-3 base defense.

    Base front is inferred from roster composition (agrees with snap data at Spearman 0.50). Most teams play nickel by default, so this is a weak descriptor: measured defensive efficiency carries far more weight in the model.

  • SchemeIND

    IND faces a 4-3 front

    CLE's roster profiles as a 4-3 base defense.

    Base front is inferred from roster composition (agrees with snap data at Spearman 0.50). Most teams play nickel by default, so this is a weak descriptor: measured defensive efficiency carries far more weight in the model.

  • Recent formCLE

    CLE -4.2 pts/game trend

    Over the last 10 games (exponentially weighted), CLE has been being outscored by opponents by 4.2 points per game.

  • Recent formIND

    IND -5.0 pts/game trend

    Over the last 10 games (exponentially weighted), IND has been being outscored by opponents by 5.0 points per game.

  • VenueCLE

    CLE at home

    Home teams have won 54.7% of games in the training window; the model prices this in rather than applying a fixed bonus.

Every figure here comes from Calibrated Logistic Regression (core + market features), validated walk-forward by season (train on all prior seasons, test on the next). For how the model is built, what the metrics mean and how it has actually performed, read the methodology.